Ten Simple Rules for a Bioinformatics Journal Club
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Ten Simple Rules for a Bioinformatics Journal Club
1 ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 2 Bioinformatics, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3 School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 4 School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria...
متن کاملTen Simple Rules for Developing a Short Bioinformatics Training Course
1 Biocomputing Group, Department of Physics, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy, 2 Bioinformatics & Functional Genomics Research Group, Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, CSIC/USAL), Salamanca, Spain, 3 Faculty of Life Sciences and School of Computer Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 4 Computational Biology Branch, National Center for Biotechnology Information, Na...
متن کاملTen Simple Rules for Reviewers
Last summer, the Student Council of the International Society for Computational Biology prompted an Editorial, ‘‘Ten Simple Rules for Getting Published’’ [1]. The interest in that piece (it has been downloaded 14,880 times thus far) prompted ‘‘Ten Simple Rules for Writing a Grant’’ [2]. With this third contribution, the ‘‘Ten Rules’’ series would seem to be established, and more rules for diffe...
متن کاملTen Simple Rules for Writing a PLOS Ten Simple Rules Article
1 Bioinformatics, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 2 Life Science Computation Centre, Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative, Carlton, Victoria, Australia, 3 The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 4 The Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Cell Walls, School of Botany, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic...
متن کاملTen Simple Rules for a Successful Collaboration
S cientific research has always been a collaborative undertaking, and this is particularly true today. For example, between 1981 and 2001, the average number of coauthors on a paper for the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A rose from 3.9 to 8.4 [1]. Why the increase? Biology has always been considered the study of living systems; many of us now think of it as the study of co...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: PLOS Computational Biology
سال: 2016
ISSN: 1553-7358
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004526